Legal Opinion

Denivelle Co. v. Leonard Keil, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action by the Denivelle Company against Leonard Keil, a corporation. Verdict for plaintiff. A motion to reduce the verdict denied. ’

1Opinion of the CourtTompkins, J.

This is a motion to reduce the verdict of the jury by striking out several items of special damages.

[1] The plaintiff’s president went to the defendant’s office, and .there told the defendant’s president that he wanted a boiler for the plaintiff’s factory, and on the recommendation of the defendant’s president purchased the boiler in suit. The plaintiff’s president then paid $20 deposit on account of the purchase price of the boiler, and received from the defendant a memorandum of the terms "of the sale which are written upon the printed billhead of the defendant. This memorandum is in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beeman v. . BantaNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Miller v. F. R. Patch Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Russell v. Corning Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. Russell v. Corning Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  5. Charter Gas Engine Co. v. KellamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Waldman Produce, Inc. v. Frigidaire Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1935
  2. Bennett v. PiscitelloRochester City Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API