Legal Opinion
Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided October 26, 2001No. 2001-C-0752PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
798 So.2d 951 (2001)
Michael J. FONTENOT
v.
REDDELL VIDRINE WATER DISTRICT, et al.
No. 2001-C-0752.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
October 26, 2001.
Michael B. Miller, Crowley, Counsel for Applicant.
Sammie M. Henry, Baton Rouge, Counsel for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.[*]
The judgment of the court of appeal is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, to render judgment anew after reconciling conflicting rulings in Fontenot v. Vidrine Water District, 00-762 (La.App. 3rd Cir.2/21/01), 780 So.2d 1197 and Haynes v. Williams Fence and Aluminum, 01-0026 (La.App. 3rd Cir.7/25/01) ___…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Haynes v. Williams Fence and AluminumLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Haynes v. FenceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- White v. Shop RiteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Banks v. New Orleans Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002