Legal Opinion
Decker v. United States Department of Labor
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided July 31, 1979No. Civ. A. 78-C-634PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.
This is an action for injunctive relief brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331(a), 1337, 1343(3), and 1361. The plaintiffs, who are federal income taxpayers residing in Wisconsin, challenge the award of grants and contracts under Title II of the Comprehensive Employment Training Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 841 et seq. (“CETA”), to religious institutions for the employment of teachers and other staff for parochial schools. The defendants the United States Department of Labor and Ray Marshall are charged with administering…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. NyquistSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Board of Ed. of Central School Dist. No. 1 v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Meek v. PittengerSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rum Creek Coal Sales, Inc. v. CapertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Americans United for Separation of Church & State v. City of Grand RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Americans United for Separation of Church and State, a Corporation Benjamin Baum Phyllis Ball Walter Bergman John Charles Bearden Gilbert R. Davis, and James T. Weaver v. City of Grand Rapids, a Municipal Corporation v. Chabad House of Western Michigan, a Corporation, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Samuels v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- City of Tucson v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.