Ketcham v. Davis
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 10, March T., 1906, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Tioga Co., Sept. T., 1905, No. 286, for defendant non obstante veredicto in case of R. M. Ketcham v. Pranlc M. Davis. Issue to determine validity of a judgment. Before Cameron, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. ■ Error assigned was in entering judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rice, P. J.,
The plaintiff having a team of horses which the defendant desired to purchase, they agreed upon $250 as the price, and the defendant delivered to the plaintiff a horse in payment to the extent of $75.00. Thereupon the plaintiff delivered the team to the defendant under a written agreement called a lease, for the term of six months, in which the defendant agreed to pay for the use of the team $101.50 on July 1, 1905, and $77.25 on October 1,1905. These two sums together with the price of the horse given in exchange constituted the agreed price of the team, with interest…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Seanor & Bierer v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Campbell etc. Co. v. HickokSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Jacob v. GroffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Scott v. HoughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
3Cited by7 opinions
- Auto Security Co. v. CanelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Hoover v. OberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Smith v. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting Annuities v. HarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Elliott to Use v. DouglassSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.