Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Stifel v. Flad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1887PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Proceeding- by mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, J.

Upon the suggestion of the relator, an alternatiye writ was issued, commanding the respondent to show cause for his failure to issue certain special tax bills to the relator, which the latter claims it is the duty of the respondent to issue to him under a provision of an ordir nance of the city, and of a contract entered into betweeii. the city of St. Louis and the relator.

The respondent demurs to the writ on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to entitle the relator to the relief prayed for.

*501There is a clerical error in the writ, which purports to be, in its descriptive part, a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Neenan v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  2. Overall v. RuenziSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  3. First National Bank v. ArnoldiaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Dickhaus v. OlderheideMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Boonville ex rel. Cosgrove v. StephensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API