Legal Opinion

Ames v. New York Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 29, 1922No. 23,171PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Action by the beneficiary in a policy of life insurance to recover the amount of the policy. Appellant sought to defeat a recovery on three grounds: First, that there were false statements in the application; second, that no contract of insurance was consummated; and third, that a change in the physical condition of the applicant took place between , the date of the application and the date of the delivery of the policy and that such change was concealed. At the close of the evidence there was a motion for a directed verdict. The court denied the motion and refused to submit the last…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Piedmont, Etc. Life-Ins. Co. v. Ewing, Etc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. McElroyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  3. Olsson v. Midland InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Cable v. United States Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
  5. Johnson v. National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. MacK v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Shaughnessy v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. D. A. Swanstrom Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Rice v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API