Legal Opinion

Pickett v. State

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided November 12, 2013No. 2012-KA-00939-COAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIS, P. J., for the Court:

¶ 1. Thomas Nathan Pickett appeals his sexual-battery conviction. He argues that: the trial court erred in allowing the testimony of James, a minor, under Mississippi Rule of Evidence 803(24); the trial court erred in allowing the testimony of Brandy, a minor, under Mississippi Rule of Evidence 803(25); the trial court erred in accepting Gwen Stephens as an expert witness; and the cumulative effect of the numerous errors in the trial denied Pickett his fundamental right to a fair trial. We find no error and affirm.

FACTS

¶ 2. In 2011, Pickett resided with Dawn (his…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Puckett v. StuckeyMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Reynolds v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Kolberg v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Marks v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Wright v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hutto v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  2. JaTryan Martel Tuggle a/k/a JaTyran Tuggle a/k/a Jaytran Tuggle v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2024
  3. James Cobb Hutto, III v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Latoya Brisco v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API