People v. Hulet
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice English
After a bench trial, defendant was convicted of burglary and sentenced to a term of two-to-four years. His codefendant, Young, was found not guilty. In this appeal defendant contends that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence his alleged confession; that there was no competent evidence of the corpus delicti in corroboration of the alleged confession; and that the trial court erred in failing to consider testimony of the codefendant.
The record shows that defendant began drinking at the Hi-Fi Lounge at about 9:00 p. m. on March 21, 1963. Defendant testified that he drank gin, wine…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lynumn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- The PEOPLE v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- The People v. O'NeilIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- The People v. TownsendIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. WiseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. StoneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- People v. DelgadoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- People v. PoteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- People v. PickerelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- People v. ReddenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.