Legal Opinion

People v. Hulet

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 30, 1965No. Gen. 50,090PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice English

After a bench trial, defendant was convicted of burglary and sentenced to a term of two-to-four years. His codefendant, Young, was found not guilty. In this appeal defendant contends that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence his alleged confession; that there was no competent evidence of the corpus delicti in corroboration of the alleged confession; and that the trial court erred in failing to consider testimony of the codefendant.

The record shows that defendant began drinking at the Hi-Fi Lounge at about 9:00 p. m. on March 21, 1963. Defendant testified that he drank gin, wine…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lynumn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. The PEOPLE v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  3. The People v. O'NeilIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  4. The People v. TownsendIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State v. WiseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. StoneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. People v. DelgadoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. People v. PoteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  4. People v. PickerelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. People v. ReddenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API