Legal Opinion

Dippert v. Sohl

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1952No. File 9271PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.

Plaintiff, Emma Dippert, brought this action against the defendant, John Sohl, to recover damages she alleged to have sustained when the car in which she was riding struck the rear of defendant’s car. E'd Dippert, the husband of the plaintiff and the driver of the automobile in which she was riding, was brought into the action as a party defendant. At the close of plaintiff’s testimony the trial court directed a verdict against her and she has appealed. The question presented is whether under the evidence the trial court was correct in directing the verdict.

The court having directed a verdict…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wallace v. BrendeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Lapp v. J. Lauesen & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mongar Ex Rel. Mongar v. BarnardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  2. McDonnel v. LakingsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Schoenrock v. City of SissetonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Dehnert v. Garrett Feed CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Leo v. AdamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API