Legal Opinion
Smith v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided May 15, 2003No. 02-787Published
1Opinion of the Court
114 S.W.3d 205 (2003)
Sarah SMITH,
v.
SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY.
No. 02-787.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
May 15, 2003.
Jeff Slaton, Springdale, for appellant.
Davis, Wright, Clark, Butt & Carithers, PLC, by Constance G. Clark and Don A. Taylor, Fayetteville, for appellee.
RAY THORNTON, Justice.
Appellant, Sarah Smith, appeals the trial court's granting of summary judgment in favor of Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company (Farm Bureau). Mrs. Smith appeals the trial court's decision that the phrase "you or any member of your family residing in your household" in an…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Elam v. First Unum Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Continental Casualty Company v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Norris Ex Rel. Thomas v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Smith v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.