Legal Opinion
Bituminous Casualty Corporation v. Swartout
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 29, 1965No. 39318PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Plaintiff sued to recover premiums claimed to be due under a retrospective premium plan after it had canceled an insurance contract for reasons other than nonpayment of premiums.
Defendant is a gravel contractor who operates a fleet of trucks and other equipment on road construction work. Effective July 1, 1957, plaintiff issued a workmen’s compensation policy and a comprehensive liability policy covering defendant’s operations for a 1-year term. An endorsement, called a retrospective premium endorsement, applied to the policies and renewals thereof for a period of 3 years…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Cement, Sand & Gravel Co. v. Agricultural InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Donarski v. LardySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Oil Well Drilling Co. v. Associated Indemnity Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1954
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Oil Well Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- American Insurance v. C.S. Mc Crossan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- The American Insurance Company v. C.S. Mccrossan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Security Insurance Company of Hartford v. A. G. Wimpy and A. G. Wimpy Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Watson Seafood & Poultry Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.