Legal Opinion

People v. Fridman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 1988PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

In the context of the conversation between the defendant and the police, the defendant’s suggestions that he or the police might want to consult with his attorney with respect to certain matters cannot be said to constitute an unequivocal assertion of the right to counsel. In addition, we note that the defendant was not in custody, was in his own office and continued the discussion with the police as if the suggestions had never been made.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Hancock, Jr.,…

2Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. SilburnCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2018
  3. People v. OxleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. People v. HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. People v. PhoenixAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API