Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Wells

California Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1906No. S.F. No. 4475PublishedCited by 2 opinions

MOTION to dismiss two appeals from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco setting apart a homestead. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This case is before us on a motion of Eeba E. Wells to dismiss two appeals from an order setting apart to her a homestead. One of the appeals is by Laura M. Wells, Susie B. Wells, and Asa H. Wells, and the other by William W. Wells. The appellants Laura M., Susie B., and Asa H. Wells have by their attorneys executed and filed a written instrument withdrawing their appeal and ask this court to dismiss the same without costs. As to the appellant William W. Wells, it fully appears from the record that he filed his notice of appeal on the nineteenth day of October, 1905, from the order…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cotton-Macauley Co. v. DeshieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. In re Estate of Wells, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API