Legal Opinion
City of Atlanta v. United Electric Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 19, 1991No. A91A1355PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Birdsong, Presiding Judge.
The City of Atlanta and the Downtown Development Authority of the City of Atlanta (collectively “the City”) appeal from the grant of summary judgment to United Electric Company (“United”) on its claim against the city under OCGA §§ 13-10-1 and 36-82-101 et seq., to recover money owed by a contractor performing work on a project in Underground Atlanta. The city contends that OCGA §§ 13-10-1 and 36-82-101 et seq., do not apply to this case because Underground Atlanta is not a public works project, and because performance bonds were required and obtained for part of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nations v. Downtown Development AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Kelly Energy Systems, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Odom v. Union City Downtown Development AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- CARCO SUPPLY COMPANY v. Dick Clem, Master Plumber, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Housing Authority v. Marbut Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
3Cited by4 opinions
- J & a PIPELINE CO. v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Davidson Pipe Supply Co. v. Wyoming County Industrial Development AgencyNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- Atlanta Mechanical, Inc. v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- City of Marietta v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993