Legal Opinion
State v. Rodriguez
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 2005No. 27,409PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SERNA, Justice.
{1} Following a jury trial, Defendant Freddie Rodriguez was convicted of tampering with evidence, in violation of NMSA 1978, § 30-22-5 (1963, prior to 2003 amendment), conspiracy to commit tampering with evidence, in violation of NMSA 1978, § 30-28-2 (1979), theft of a credit card, in violation of NMSA 1978, § 30-16-26 (1971), and contributing to the delinquency of a minor, in violation of NMSA 1978, § 30-6-3 (1990). On appeal to the Court of Appeals, Defendant argued that his convictions violated the constitutional protection against double jeopardy. Specifically, he…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. CaldwellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Rodney J. Miles a/k/a Jamal D. Allen (077035) (Camden County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- State v. CollierNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. CastilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.