James v. State

VILLANTI, Judge.

Travis Rodriguez James seeks review of the revocation of his probation and the resulting sentence, arguing that the State failed to prove that he was ever properly *619advised that he was on probation and that therefore he could not have willfully violated his probation. Because the undisputed facts bear out this assertion, we reverse the revocation of James’s probation and remand for James to be released in this case to serve the remainder of his probationary sentence.

On June 30, 2009, James entered guilty pleas in;four separate cases. In three of those cases, he was sentenced to…