Legal Opinion
In re Russell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 28, 1995PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice in 1966 by the Appellate Division, Second Department.
On April 14, 1994, this Court suspended respondent from practice, effective May 5, 1994, pending his compliance with a subpoena duces tecum obtained by petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, and until further order of the Court (Matter of Russell, 203 AD2d 707). At the time of his suspension, respondent maintained a law office in Fulton County. The suspension has remained in effect to date.
Petitioner now moves to strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys because he pleaded guilty…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re BallingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re RussellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re BurkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re KrounerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re EtkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Matter of DoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re SandersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.