Martin v. City of Glasgow
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS B. RUSSELL, Senior District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment by Plaintiff and Defendants (DN 32; DN 33). The parties have fully briefed the motions (DN 35; DN 36; DN 37; DN 38; DN 39) and they now are ripe for review. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is DENIED and Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART. This matter is hereby DISMISSED.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Larry Martin (“Martin”) was employed as a police officer with the City of Glasgow, Kentucky (“the City”) until the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Seger v. City of LancasterDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2013
- Chris Trulock v. Horse Cave City et al.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2026
- Fiscus v. PierceyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Michael Schell v. Troy L. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021