Legal Opinion

People v. Van Sickle

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1982No. Docket 55761, 55762PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Each defendant was charged with one count of first-degree criminal sexual conduct. MCL 750.520b(l); MSA 28.788(2)(1). Following a joint jury trial, each defendant was convicted as charged and sentenced to a prison term of 25 to 45 years. They appeal as of right. We affirm.

Defendants first contend that the trial court abused its discretion in denying their motion for a continuance, brought on the day trial began, in *635order that they might retain counsel who had been recommended by a friend. Each defendant was represented by the same court-appointed attorney.

The granting of a continuance is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. MacCulloughMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. People v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. DixonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. People v. BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. CurryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. YoungMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. BurnettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. People v. Van SickleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. YoungMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API