Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Boody

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1897No. Sac. No. 383PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County making partial distribution of the estate of a deceased person and from an order denying a new trial. Joseph H. Budd, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

SEARLS, C.

This is an appeal from an order of partial distribution of the estate of Joseph B. Boody, and from an order .refusing a new trial therein. The order distributes certain par*403cels of real estate "belonging to said estate. The sole question ire issue is whether the lands so distributed were community, property or the separate property of Joseph B. Boody, deceased.

Joseph B. Boody died intestate, in the county of San Joaquin,. November 7, 1893, without issue, leaving him surviving as his heirs at law Elizabeth Boody, his widow, Emily Foss, a sister, and the children of a deceased brother.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bauer v. GarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. In re Estate of LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. In re the Estate of BoodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Harris v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. In re Estate of HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of PepperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Minium v. MiniumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Meyer v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Ellis v. EllisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. In re Estate of Foster, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API