Village of Elmwood Park v. Keegan
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leighton
The issue in this appeal is whether a defendant who is ordered by the judge to go out of the courtroom and get an attorney can be tried and convicted during his absence. The facts are not in dispute.
In complaints that alleged violations of two municipal ordinances, Earl R. Keegan was charged with “* * * failure to reduce speed to avoid accident [sic] * * **” and with * * driving while under the influence alcohol [sic] * * He went to court twice without an attorney. On each occasion, he asked for and was granted a continuance. The third time, on the morning of February 7, 1973, Keegan…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Village of Maywood v. HoustonIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- Grant v. PaluchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Osborne v. LeonardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
- Kopplin v. KopplinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1946
- Gross v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
3Cited by6 opinions
- Onaka v. OnakaHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- Silverman v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- In Re Marriage of AllisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Hubbard v. HubbardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Sharpe v. PorikosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.