Herter v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
The legality of a search of a private dwelling without a search warrant is the only question presented for decision. It was conceded on the argument that the search was unlawful, unless the plaintiff in error waived his constitutional rights by consenting thereto, and this is manifestly true. Cola v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 22 F.(2d) 742, and cases there cited. The only testimony bearing on the question of consent was this:
One of the prohibition agents testified on direct examination that he called at the dwelling of the plaintiff in error for the purpose of purchasing…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Farris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Cola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
3Cited by17 opinions
- Judd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- United States v. Ernest T. PageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Henry W. Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Nelson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Harold W. Greenwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.