Legal Opinion
Enriquez v. Home Lawn Care & Landscaping, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 4, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*497Contrary to the contention of the defendant James Egloff, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion for leave to amend the complaint to add him to the action as a party defendant, since the plaintiff alleged facts which, if proven true, could subject Egloff to personal liability for the plaintiffs injuries (see generally CPLR 1001 [a]; City of New York v Long Is. Airports Limousine Serv. Corp., 48 NY2d 469, 475 [1979]; Bay Ridge Lbr. Co. v Groenendaal, 175 AD2d 94 [1991]).
Similarly, the court properly denied that branch of Egloff s motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Nonnon v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
- City of New York v. Long Island Airports Limousine Service Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Bay Ridge Lumber Co. v. GroenendaalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rahman v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Tolpygina v. TeperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009