Legal Opinion

Com. v. Hilliard

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 9, 2005No. Record 042204Published

1Opinion of the Court

613 S.E.2d 579 (2005)

270 Va. 42

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

v.

Curtis Darnell HILLIARD.

Record No. 042204.

Supreme Court of Virginia.

June 9, 2005.

Steven A. Witmer, Assistant Attorney General (Judith Williams Jagdmann, Attorney General, on brief), Richmond, for appellant.

Steven D. Benjamin (Betty Layne DesPortes; Benjamin & DesPortes, on brief), Richmond, for appellee.

Present: All the Justices.

KEENAN, Justice.

In this appeal, we consider whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that a defendant's motion to suppress an incriminating statement should have been granted because he made the statement…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Agee; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Agee.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API