Legal Opinion
Norman S. Riesenfeld, Inc. v. R. W. Realty Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided July 15, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGenung, J.
The landlord claims that the lease terminated on September 26, 1924, by the service of a certain notice after default by the tenant in the performance of certain covenants of the lease, as in said agreement provided.
The lease provided:
“Fifth. That throughout said term the Tenant will take good care of the demised premises and appurtenances and suffer no waste or injury; and make all repairs, structural and otherwise, both inside and outside, in and about the demised premises and fixtures and appurtenances, necessary to preserve the same in good order and condition, which repairs shall be, in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beach v. . NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- In re Guaranty Building Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Rose v. . HawleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Kramer v. AmbergNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1889
- Manhattan Life Insurance v. GosfordNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norman S. Riesenfeld, Inc. v. R-W Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Circulation Associates, Inc. v. Mother's Manual, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1967
- Taylor v. GunnTennessee Supreme Court · 1950