Legal Opinion

Kyger v. Koeper

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1946PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

This is an action in prohibition. The first thing for consideration is respondents’ motion to dismiss the appeal of appellant.

The burden of such motion is that appellant called the transcript on appeal a “Bill of Exceptions,” instead of a transcript, and inserted unnecessary matters therein. We have examined the so-called “Bill of Exceptions” and find that it contains everything required in a transcript on appeal, and seems to have been timely filed. It is true, that the so-called “Bill of Exceptions” contains matters not required to be filed to secure appellate review; but it does contain…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fabrico v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  2. State Ex Rel. Ford v. HoganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  4. Inc. of Little Tarkio Drainage District No. 1 v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  5. State Ex. Rel. Gary Realty Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kyger v. KoerperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  2. Todd Ex Rel. Todd v. StokesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API