Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel Bohman
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 28, 2012No. 10-3656PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TINDER, Circuit Judge.
The question presented in this appeal is whether the police may stop a vehicle only because it emerged from a site suspected of drug activity. Appellant Daniel Bohman raised this question in a motion to suppress evidence discovered when the car he was driving on August 18, 2009, was stopped leaving what turned out to be an active meth lab. His motion was denied after a hearing conducted by a magistrate judge and review by a district judge on a report and recommendation. Bohman preserved his objection to the adverse ruling through a conditional guilty plea pursuant to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Shaun J. Matz v. Rodney KlotkaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Herbert Williams v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Theodore RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Adrian RuizCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Brian WilbournCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.