Legal Opinion

FITZGERALD v. DAVIS

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 25, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00997Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DAWMEEN FITZGERALD, Civil Action No. 24-997 (MCA) Petitioner, : v. : MEMORANDUM OPINION BRUCE DAVIS Warden, ef al, Respondents. : This matter comes before the Court on Dawmeen Filzgerald’s filing of a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C, § 2254, along with the filing fee. (ECF Nos. [, 2.) The Court has screened the Petition for summary dismissal pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts; that Rule requires the Court to examine whether it “plainly appears from the petition and any…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Magwood v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Eric Robinson v. Philip L. Johnson the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, Mike FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  5. Blystone v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API