Legal Opinion
United States v. Berger
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 25, 2000No. Docket Nos. 99-1671 to 99-1674PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge:
Defendants-appellants Kalmen Stern (“Stern”), David Goldstein (“Goldstein”), Jacob Elbaum (“Elbaum”), and Benjamin Berger (“Berger”) appeal from the November 1999 judgments of conviction entered and sentences imposed by the district court upon jury verdicts of guilty. They raise a number of issues on appeal. First, and most importantly, the appellants allege that they were improperly convicted of the fraud conspiracy charged in the indictment because the evidence showed multiple conspiracies rather than a single conspiracy and this variance…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- United States v. McDermottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- United States v. SalmoneseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Jon Geibel, Chad L. Conner, and Gordon K. Allen, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Deborah A. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.