Legal Opinion

Means v. Clardy

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1990No. WD 42271Published

1Opinion of the Court

BERREY, Judge.

Appeal from a judgment, after retrial, in favor of defendants-respondents, Bruce Clardy, Gary Doerhoff, Joan Doerhoff, John Gross and Zurich Insurance Company in an action brought by plaintiffs-appellants, Rick Means and Fred Barry, to collect on a promissory note and to collect damages against a notary and his insurance company for the making of a false acknowledgment. Appellants present four points on appeal: (1) that the trial court erred in determining that the document in question was a contract and not a note; (2) that the trial court erred in finding for respondents Gross…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Cox v. BlackwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Means v. ClardyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Barkley v. Monsanto Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API