People v. Chin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in failing to give proper limiting instructions concerning the jury’s use of the testimony regarding his prior bad acts is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Giuca, 58 AD 3d 750, 751 [2009]; People v Green, 56 AD 3d 490, 490-491 [2008]; People v Hawker, 215 AD2d 499, 500 [1995]). In any event, the court gave an appropriate limiting instruction (see People v Norman, 40 AD3d 1128 [2007]; People v Satiro, 132 AD2d 717, 717-718 [1987], affd 12 NY2d 821 [1988]).
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, since criminal…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. SeymourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. CaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. MazyckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. BernardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. McGinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.