Legal Opinion

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Brant

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The accused, Brant, was charged with eight causes of complaint. There were seven specific charges of misconduct. Generally, they alleged that defendant gave a false answer to a question in his application for the bar examination relative to prior criminal conduct; that on more than one occasion he willfully ig*563nored lawful orders of a circuit court; that he misrepresented facts to a circuit judge and that he represented conflicting interests in a divorce proceeding. The eighth charge was a general allegation that his conduct was such that a present application for admission to the bar would be…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re James E. BrantOregon Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API