Legal Opinion

Wood v. United Air Lines, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 24, 1963No. Civ. A. Nos. 61 C 620, 61 C 276PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ABRUZZO, District Judge.

This is a companion motion to a motion-decided by this Court, D.C., 216 F.Supp. 340.

The motion of United Air Lines, Inc., to consolidate Actions No. 1 and No. 2: (61 C 620 and 61 C 276), referred to in. said companion motion, is granted.

The opposition of the United. States of America is without merit. United Air Lines, Inc., and Trans World Airlines, Inc., as third-party defendants can demand a jury trial even though the-plaintiffs’ action was instituted under the-Federal Tort Claims Act. In a claim by the United States of America, any party is entitled to a jury. See…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. RosatiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1951
  2. United States v. SchlitzDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1949
  3. Wood v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1963

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lowell Palmer v. United States of America, United States of America, Third-Party v. Donald Paul Fisher, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  2. Barron v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Wright v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1978
  4. Georges v. HennesseyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1982
  5. Collins v. General Motors Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API