Wood v. United Air Lines, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
ABRUZZO, District Judge.
This is a companion motion to a motion-decided by this Court, D.C., 216 F.Supp. 340.
The motion of United Air Lines, Inc., to consolidate Actions No. 1 and No. 2: (61 C 620 and 61 C 276), referred to in. said companion motion, is granted.
The opposition of the United. States of America is without merit. United Air Lines, Inc., and Trans World Airlines, Inc., as third-party defendants can demand a jury trial even though the-plaintiffs’ action was instituted under the-Federal Tort Claims Act. In a claim by the United States of America, any party is entitled to a jury. See…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. RosatiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1951
- United States v. SchlitzDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1949
- Wood v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1963
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lowell Palmer v. United States of America, United States of America, Third-Party v. Donald Paul Fisher, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Barron v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Wright v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1978
- Georges v. HennesseyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- Collins v. General Motors Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.