Legal Opinion

Shank v. Saul

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 15, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2019-2400Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TAMIKA S. SHANK, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-2400 (JEB) ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Tamika Shank, a 43-year-old woman who has had a learning disability since childhood, received over $38,000 in excess Social Security Disability Insurance benefits from 2003 to 2006, which the Social Security Administration has sought to recover. In a prior agency action, the Commissioner of Social Security determined that Shank was “not without fault” in receiving the SSDI overpayments and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Butler, Joan S. v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  4. Rose E. Brown v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  5. Florida Municipal Power Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API