Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Wilhelm

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 10, 1933No. 4955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

The alleged bankrupt (for eonvenienc> called the bankrupt) moved to dismiss the petition on the contention that no act of bankruptcy is sufficiently alleged. From an order of the.District Court- denying the motion on a holding that the assailed averments of acts of bankruptcy are fully informative and therefore sufficient, the bankrupt took this appeal in which he has raised two questions: One, whether the charges of acts of bankruptcy comply with the rules of pleading; the other, whether the entire petition is void because of repugnancy.

The acts of bankruptcy purported…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. CisnerosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  2. United States v. Illera PlazaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. State v. MontoyaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  4. Knecht v. Castleman River R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API