Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Winings

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1885No. 11,897PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

This is an action to recover possession of land and to quiet title, instituted by the appellee. The facts are substantially these: In 1867 the firm of Forkner & Winings, composed of Micajah Forkner and Samuel Winings, became the owners of the lot in controversy; in 1871 Robert .and Franklin Newcom obtained judgment against Micajah Forkner on a note executed by him, for one hundred and sixty-five dollars; on this judgment Forkner’s interest was .sold on the 28th day of May, 1881, and bought by the appellee, and in September, 1882, she obtained a quitclaim deed from the heirs of Joseph Winings,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. FrenchIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Short v. SearsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Carver v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Hines v. DresherIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Jackson v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. State ex rel. MacKenzie v. CasteelIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Morrison v. JacobyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. GranthamIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API