Legal Opinion

McCord-Norton Shoe Co. v. Brown

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 5, 1930No. 29,003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

Was the plaintiff, a creditor, entitled to maintain a garnishment proceeding against a trustee to whom an insolvent merchant transferred all of his property for the benefit of creditors that should accept under the provisions of a trust mortgage which he executed? — is the principal question presented for review. The claimed right was denied by. the district court, and plaintiff appeals.

It appears that Karl E. Brown, who had been engaged for some time in merchandising, had become insolvent. He had on hand June 18, 1928, a stock of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kayser v. HeavenrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  2. Clark v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garrison v. Pilliod Cabinet Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API