Andrews v. Nilson
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Hearing on an appeal from a decision of tbe Commissioner of Patents in an interference case. The facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Duell
This appeal brings before us for review the correctness of *453the decision of the Commissioner of Patents awarding priority of invention to Lars G. Nilson, the senior party, of the following issue:
“In an interrupter, the combination of an electro-magnet, a vibratory strip carrying a contact point, and a two-part armature mounted on said strip at opposite sides of the contact point.”
The interference as originally declared was between two claims of a patent issued November 18, 1902, to Nilson, upon an application filed May 14, 1902. William S. Andrews’s application, however, was filed June 5,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ryder v. SchlichterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marshall v. LedwinkaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933