Legal Opinion

McCarty v. Tax Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Under the three-year-average method of assessing incomes which obtained in this state at the time of the assessment under review, the law required the payment of a tax on all average net incomes by every person residing *647within the state or by his personal representative in case of death, and declared that every natural person who was domiciled in' the state “shall be presumed to be residing within the state for the purposes of determining liability for income taxes and surtaxes.” Sec. 71.01, Stats. 1929. There is no dispute but that the appellant was domiciled within the state during the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Will of EatonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Fitch v. Wisconsin Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Kellogg v. Supervisors of Winnebago CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Kempster v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Carter v. SommermeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wiegand v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. In Re the Appeal of YerianHawaii Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Scobie v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Greene v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Messinger v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API