Legal Opinion

Lee v. Boutwell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1875PublishedCited by 48 opinions

Error from Hunt. Tried below before the Hon. W. H. Andrews.

1Opinion of the Court

Roberts, Chief Justice.

Boutwell recovered a judgment against Lee in the court below, and the error complained of was the refusal of the court to give a charge to the jury of the statute of limitations of two years as applicable to the cause of action set up in the amended petition of plaintiff.

The original petition stated that the plaintiff and defendant had entered into a verbal contract for the plaintiff to take charge of a stock of horses, and take care of them for three years, beginning on tbe first day of April, 1872, for which he was to receive every fourth colt of the increase of said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ray v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Holmstrom v. Lee, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  2. Wagner & Chabot v. Westchester Fire InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Fuller v. El Paso Times Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. Western Guaranty Loan Co. v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Elmo v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API