Legal Opinion

Truck Terminal Realty Co. v. Boston Redevelopment Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 7, 1976PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraucher, J.

The plaintiff’s land was taken by the defendant by eminent domain, and later a pro tanto payment was made. G. L. c. 79, § 8A. The plaintiff claims interest on the amount of the pro tanto payment from the date of taking until the date it received notice that the payment was available to it. The defendant claims that no interest was owed for this period because the payment could not be made until the plaintiff obtained a release of a lease on the premises. A j'udge of the Superior Court awarded the plaintiff the interest it claimed, and we affirm.

*500The facts are stipulated. The plaintiff’s right…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lowell Housing Authority v. Save-Mor Furniture Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  2. Woodworth v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  3. Kahler v. Town of MarshfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  4. Dodge v. Inhabitants of RockportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. Universal Container Corp. v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hannon v. City of NewtonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  2. R. H. White Realty Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Dube v. O'ConnorMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1981
  4. Dube v. O'ConnorMassachusetts District Court · 1981
  5. Franks v. HennessyMassachusetts Superior Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API