Legal Opinion

Ostrow v. New London Pharmacy, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 28, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered September 20, 1999, which denied plaintiffs post-trial motion to set aside the jury verdict in favor of defendant New London Pharmacy and to hold a new trial on the issues of liability and damages, or, alternatively, to set aside the verdict, enter judgment for plaintiff as to liability and hold a new trial solely on the issue of damages, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff alleged that her ulcerative colitis was worsened by her ingestion of the drug sulfadiazine, which defendant pharmacy mistakenly dispensed to…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. LuvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Haynes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. Haynes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API