Gladden v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
The petitioner was convicted on his trial before a jury in the law and equity court of the offense of driving a motor vehicle on a highway of the state while intoxicated in violation of the provisions of § 2, Title 36, Code of 1940. On his appeal the judgment of conviction was affirmed. He now complains that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that, “Where however an opportunity for observation is shown, even though slight, a witness should be considered competent to testify as to what he did observe”, 54 So.2d 609.
We think this was within the well established exception to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Spooney v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Mayberry v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
3Cited by10 opinions
- Britton v. DoehringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Jolly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Rivers v. BlackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Patterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.