Legal Opinion

Wulfers v. E. W. Clark Motor Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

The complaint in this action alleged that the defendant warranted a Maxwell automobile to be a 1919 or late 1918 model and that plaintiff was thereby induced to buy it, when it was in fact a 1917 model and of greatly inferior value. The answer denied that the representa*498tions were made and alleged that the car. was carefully inspected by the plaintiff.

The case was tried in the civil court of Milwaukee county without a jury, and the court found that the false representations were made with intent to deceive, and that plaintiff relied on them and was thereby induced to buy the machine; that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swanby v. Northern State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Klaus v. KlausWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Samuel Meyers, Inc. v. Ogden Shoe Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Jones v. KeefeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Walber v. WalberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Duffy v. ScottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Kuester v. RowlandsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Treptau v. Behrens Spa, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Morse Chain Co. v. T. W. Meiklejohn, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API