Padgett v. Jones
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. As provided in the act approved August 18, 1916 (Ga. L. 1916, p. 48), no penalty or forfeiture attaches to a lender because of an usurious contract, other than the forfeiture of the entire interest charged or taken.
*245Decided August 20, 1925. C. L. Cowart, for plaintiffs in error. P. M. Anderson, H. B. Kimbrough, contra.
2. It follows that the transferee of a promissory note, who has taken it as collateral security for an usurious loan made by him to the transferor since the above-cited act of 1916, will not, by reason of the usurious contract, be deprived of his status as a bona fide holder.
3.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Laing v. Hinesville BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pickens Investment Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950