Legal Opinion

Padgett v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 20, 1925No. 15910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. As provided in the act approved August 18, 1916 (Ga. L. 1916, p. 48), no penalty or forfeiture attaches to a lender because of an usurious contract, other than the forfeiture of the entire interest charged or taken.

*245Decided August 20, 1925. C. L. Cowart, for plaintiffs in error. P. M. Anderson, H. B. Kimbrough, contra.

2. It follows that the transferee of a promissory note, who has taken it as collateral security for an usurious loan made by him to the transferor since the above-cited act of 1916, will not, by reason of the usurious contract, be deprived of his status as a bona fide holder.

3.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Laing v. Hinesville BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pickens Investment Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API