Legal Opinion

Snowden v. Alexander-Snowden

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 6, 2003No. S03A0689PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEARS, Presiding Justice.

We granted an application for discretionary appeal filed by the appellant, James Snowden, to consider whether the trial court erred in its award of the parties’ marital home in this divorce action. Because we conclude that the trial court erred in classifying the entire interest in the home as non-marital property and in awarding it to the appellee, Gwendolyn Alexander-Snowden, we reverse.

In this State, trial courts must apply the “source of the funds” rule when equitably dividing a home that one of the parties brought to the marriage. Under this rule, a trial court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harper v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  3. Hubby v. HubbySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  4. Horsley v. HorsleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maddox v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. Southerland v. SoutherlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  3. Crowder v. CrowderSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  4. Windham v. ARAYASupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  5. Waters v. WatersSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API