Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Larson v. Probate Court

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1938No. 31,816Published

1DissentStone, Justice

It is a premise, both illuminating and inescapable, that in solving questions of jurisdiction' as between probate and district courts “the law is concerned not so much with working out an abstract and ideal harmony with respect to the limits of this dual jurisdiction as it is with the efficient administration of practical justice thereby.” Brown v. Strom, 113 Minn. 1, 5, 129 N. W. 136, 137.

Next, we are dealing with attorneys and their compensation. Attorneys, as officers of the court, are subject to its “orders and directions in respect to their relations to the court as well as to their…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. State ex rel. Martin v. UelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  4. Davis v. HudsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  5. Schmidt v. Oregon Gold Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1895

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API