Legal Opinion

Sipp v. Sipp

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 7, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant has appealed from a judgment granting the plaintiff, his wife, a legal separation on the ground of intolerable cruelty and awarding her custody of and support for two of their three minor children and alimony. The defendant seeks to substitute 181 paragraphs of his oversized 305-paragraph draft finding for 52 of the 166 paragraphs of facts found by the court. In effect, he is attempting to retry the case on appeal. This practice has been repeatedly discouraged. Ball v. Branford, 142 Conn. 13, 15, 110 A.2d 459. The minor corrections to which he is entitled will not change the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ball v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MurraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cecio Bros., Inc. v. FeldmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  2. McLaughlin v. Chicken Delight, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  4. Dombrowski v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. Kobryn v. KobrynSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API