Legal Opinion
Crosley Corp. v. Hazeltine Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 15, 1941No. 194 Civil ActionPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NIELDS, District Judge.
Motion for preliminary injunction.
This is a suit for declaratory judgment under U.S.C.A. Title 28, Section 400, brought by the Crosley Corporation, plaintiff, a corporation of Ohio, against Hazel-tine Corporation, defendant, a corporation of Delaware. Jurisdiction is based upon the patent statutes.
Plaintiff alleges that defendant has asserted that “Crosley” radio receivers manufactured and sold by plaintiff and its agents are covered by each of twenty patents set out in the complaint and owned by defendant; and that defendant has threatened infringement suits thereon.
Jan…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Milwaukee Gas Specialty Co. v. Mercoid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Link-Belt Co. v. Dorr Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1936
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. E. W. Bliss Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1937
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kerotest Mfg. Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Triangle Conduit & Cable Co. v. National Electric Products Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1941
- Kerotest Mfg. Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951