Newcomer, Admrx. v. S. Fayette C. Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Kephart,
This is an action of trespass to recover damages for the unlawful mining of coal lying between the actual crop line and the boundary line as described by courses and distances in the deeds conveying the main body of coal. A compulsory nonsuit was directed in the court below because no damages had been proved.
Appellant conveyed a 9-foot seam of coal to Foote, the descriptions in the deed extending by courses and distances to “the coal crop line,” “thence by the coal crop line,” etc. Appellee, the present owner of the coal described in this deed, contends that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lodge v. BarnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
- Miles Land Co. v. Hudson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Miller v. CramerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Pringle v. RogersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Hutchison v. Little Four Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Neal D. Ivey Co. v. Franklin Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Rohm And Haas Company v. Adco Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Rohm & Haas Co. v. Adco Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982